2015 Fiat Panda 1.2L Petrol · OV65 ULT

The most recent DVSA examination on 27 January 2026 resulted in a pass, but the inspector raised five advisories which, when read alongside the previous test outcomes, indicate a vehicle whose structural and under-bonnet condition is showing progressive age-related deterioration rather than active neglect. The advisories relate to a minor exhaust gas leak at the front pipe, corrosion on both rear coil springs, light oil misting on the nearside front shock absorber, and wear on the nearside front brake disc. Looking back through 2024 and 2025, the exhaust mounting issue has been flagged repeatedly as a defective hanger or flexi leak, and rear coil spring corrosion was previously noted in 2024 before apparently resolving in 2025 and resurfacing in 2026. The overall trend is one of stable mot passability underpinned by a slowly worsening pattern of suspension and exhaust corrosion defects typical of an eleven year old car exposed to British winters, but nothing has yet tipped into a fail category. With 71,549 miles recorded against an approximate age of eleven years, the vehicle is averaging around 6,500 miles per year, which is broadly consistent with typical urban or light mixed usage for a Fiat Panda of this generation. There is no evidence of any extremely rapid accumulation of mileage or, conversely, extended periods of standing that would raise concerns about seized brakes, perished fuel lines, or a chronically discharged battery. The mileage progression across the MOT records appears consistent and uninterrupted, suggesting the car has been in regular use throughout its life, which is mechanically favourable for components such as the clutch, drivetrain, brake calipers, and 12V battery. Nevertheless, the recurring advisories warrant careful physical inspection prior to purchase. The exhaust system should be examined from the manifold rearwards, with particular attention to the front pipe, flexi joint, and all mounting hangers, as the MOT history shows progressive corrosion across these areas over four consecutive tests; listen for an exhaust tick or whistle on the overrun, and check for soot deposits on the underbody or in the engine bay which would confirm a live leak. The rear coil springs should be inspected for visible surface corrosion, scaling, or any sign of cracking that could lead to spring failure, and the nearside front shock absorber should be checked for worsening oil seepage down the body of the unit and for any damping irregularities on the road. The nearside front Macpherson strut top mount and rear shock absorber lower bush, both previously flagged, are worth re-examining by hand for excessive play when the wheel is rocked at the opposite corner. On a test drive, pay close attention to any clonking over bumps, vagueness through corners, or a rhythmic brake shudder under firm pedal pressure which would confirm the disc wear has progressed beyond acceptable limits. Beyond the specific advisories, a prospective buyer should carry out the usual age-related checks on a car of this vintage and mileage. Tyres should be inspected for sidewall cracking and perishing even if the tread depth appears adequate, as rubber degrades with calendar age regardless of mileage. The brake calipers and handbrake mechanism should be confirmed as releasing cleanly, and the discs checked for any lip or corrosion ridges suggesting the car has been left standing for prolonged periods. All fluid states should be verified, particularly engine oil, coolant, and brake fluid, the last of which absorbs moisture over time and should be replaced on a calendar basis rather than purely by mileage. Finally, confirm a full service history with stamps at the correct intervals, verify the age and condition of the 12V battery, and ensure that the previously noted rear coil spring and shock absorber advisories have either been rectified or are budgeted for, as they will inevitably deteriorate further and are likely to feature as failure items at the next MOT if left unattended.