2016 KIA Ceed 1.6L Diesel · OV66 AHA

The Kia Ceed’s most recent MOT test on 2025-09-29 resulted in a rare double failure—an anomaly in an otherwise spotless history of five consecutive annual passes. No defects were recorded during either test, which suggests the vehicle was either driven to the test centre and immediately retested, or the failures were administrative (e.g., expired test card or minor paperwork oversight). The lack of any recurring mechanical advisories or defects across the last five years indicates the vehicle has not experienced persistent issues with suspension, brakes, or structural integrity. However, the double failure at the same test date raises a question mark over whether the vehicle was recently driven for the test, which could imply it was in active use rather than stored. The recorded mileage of 171,655 miles over approximately ten years—roughly 17,166 miles annually—is unusually high for a vehicle of this age. This suggests consistent use, likely on varied roads, which accelerates wear on suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake components. There are no gaps in the MOT history, and the mileage increments appear steady, with no sudden jumps or prolonged periods of inactivity. While this pattern indicates the vehicle was regularly driven rather than left stationary, it also implies accelerated consumption of high-wear items such as tyres, brake pads, and suspension elements. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle and bushings, which are common failure points on high-mileage Kias. The binding brake advisories from the 2023 test (if any) should be cross-checked, though the absence of further mention suggests they were resolved. Corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe should be examined closely, as prolonged high mileage increases rust susceptibility. Finally, the exhaust system and catalytic converter should be inspected for leaks or damage, as these are often overlooked but critical for emissions compliance and structural integrity. The double failure in 2025 warrants confirmation that the vehicle was not simply driven for the test without genuine maintenance.