2016 Nissan Navara 2.3L Diesel · SH64 SAM

This Nissan Navara presents a notably inconsistent MOT history that warrants careful scrutiny before purchase. The recorded sequence shows a pattern of alternating pass and fail entries with no defects listed against either outcome, which on the surface appears clean but is mechanically ambiguous. A failed test with no advisories or defects recorded typically indicates that the vehicle was either presented in a non-testable condition, such as being unable to start, lacking insurance for the test, or being submitted with an issue so fundamental that the examiner could not complete a full assessment. The repetition of this pass-fail oscillation in both 2024 and 2025 suggests an administrative or presentation issue rather than a chronic mechanical fault, though it means there is effectively no granular component data from the past two test cycles to verify the condition of the chassis, suspension, or braking systems. Against its ten-year age, the recorded 83,267 miles equates to an average annual accumulation of approximately 8,327 miles, which sits comfortably within typical usage parameters for a working pickup of this type. There are no significant gaps in the testing record or sudden mileage jumps between entries that would suggest long periods of inactivity or inconsistent odometer readings. Mechanically, this steady rate of use is favourable as it implies regular operation of the drivetrain, coolant circulation, and braking components, reducing the likelihood of seized callipers, deteriorated rubber seals, or moisture accumulation within the oil system that often accompany low-mileage or stored vehicles. Because the MOT record contains no advisories detailing component wear, the burden of identifying mechanical condition shifts heavily to a physical inspection. On a test drive, particular attention should be paid to the front suspension, as the Navara is known for wear in the front lower control arm bushes, anti-roll bar drop links, and top mount bearings; listen for clonking over speed humps and uneven road surfaces, and feel for vagueness or knocking through the steering wheel when turning. The rear leaf spring assemblies and their associated bushes should be inspected for sagging, cracking, or shifted leaves, especially given the load-carrying duties typical of this model. Brake pedal feel should be firm and consistent, with no sponginess suggesting caliper slider seizure or hydraulic issues, and the discs should be checked for lipping and corrosion. Given the absence of any component-level MOT data for the most recent two years, a pre-purchase inspection by a garage experienced with Navara chassis would be prudent. Underneath, the chassis rails, crossmembers, and particularly the fuel filter housing area should be examined for corrosion, as later model Navaras have been known to develop rust in structural locations. The intercooler piping and turbocharger connections should also be visually checked for oil residue or boost leaks, and a cold start should be performed to verify clean exhaust emissions with no excessive smoke. While the paperwork suggests a vehicle that should be roadworthy, the unusual test history means there is no recent independent verification of its mechanical state, making hands-on evaluation essential.