2016 Fiat 500 1.2L Petrol · SL16 ADU

The most recent MOT test on 2026-07-26 shows this 2016 Fiat 500 has been roadworthy, but the record reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures at the same mileage intervals. The vehicle passed on 2025-05-26 at 52,905 miles, yet the previous cycle—spanning 2024—demonstrated two consecutive failures and passes at identical mileages (45,038 and 52,864 miles), suggesting either a test centre error or a recurring mechanical issue that was intermittently overlooked. The lack of recorded defects on failures implies the tester may have missed critical faults, or the vehicle’s condition fluctuated unpredictably between tests. The most recent pass on 2025-05-26, just 14 months ago, means the vehicle has not undergone a formal inspection since, leaving a significant blind spot in its roadworthiness history. The mileage progression is unusually erratic for a vehicle of this age. Over the past two years, the recorded mileage jumped from 45,038 miles in January 2024 to 52,866 miles by August of the same year—a 7,828-mile increase in just seven months—before remaining static until the latest test. This suggests either a period of heavy use followed by prolonged inactivity, or potential mileage tampering. The low average of 5,290 miles per year over a decade aligns with light usage, but the sudden spikes contradict consistent low-mileage maintenance. Without service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether critical intervals (e.g., suspension servicing, brake fluid changes) were adhered to during these gaps. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the braking system, as the repeated failures at identical mileages may indicate underlying issues such as warped discs, seized calipers, or degraded brake pads that were just barely compliant at test time. The suspension should be scrutinised for worn bushes, corroded coil springs, or binding components, particularly if the vehicle has spent extended periods stationary. Rust penetration in wheel arches, subframes, and sills—common in urban-stationary cars—could compromise structural integrity, so a close examination of these areas is essential. The lack of advisories in recent tests is reassuring, but the pattern of near-misses warrants independent verification of both mechanical and cosmetic wear.