2016 Peugeot 108 1.2L Petrol · WD16 NEO

This Peugeot 108 lacks any MOT history, rendering a formal roadworthiness assessment impossible. Without test dates, advisories, or pass/fail outcomes, there is no basis to evaluate maintenance trends, structural integrity, or recurring mechanical failures. The absence of records also precludes any comparison to industry norms for a vehicle of this age and model. Buyers must treat this as a blank slate—no prior inspection data exists to inform expectations or risks. Mileage data is entirely absent, which complicates any assessment of usage patterns. A 2016 vehicle should have undergone at least three MOT tests by now (every 12 months), yet none are recorded. This gap alone suggests either deliberate concealment, a vehicle never legally used on UK roads, or a registration that was never properly transferred. Without mileage figures, it’s impossible to determine whether the car has been driven sparingly or excessively, or if critical components like suspension bushes or coil springs have degraded beyond typical wear thresholds. Given the complete lack of MOT data, an in-person inspection must focus on high-risk areas where wear is often overlooked. Prioritise checking for corrosion —particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe—since rust can compromise structural integrity without leaving visible MOT advisories. The suspension (bushes, dampers, and coil springs) should be examined for uneven wear or fluid leaks, as these fail frequently in under-maintained cars. Brake systems warrant close scrutiny: binding calipers, unevenly worn discs, or glazed pads are common in vehicles with inconsistent servicing. Finally, verify the exhaust system for leaks or excessive rust, as these often go unnoticed until they affect emissions or structural support. Without prior MOTs, no assumptions about past repairs can be made—every component must be treated as a potential unknown.