2016 CITROEN C11.2L Petrol

The 2016 Citroën C1’s most recent MOT test on 2025-08-22 passed without defects, though it was preceded by a failed test just four days earlier on 2025-08-18—an unusual but not unprecedented anomaly given the identical mileage. The pattern over the past three years shows no recurring mechanical failures, with all tests either passing cleanly or failing for procedural reasons (likely due to the test centre’s administrative oversight rather than genuine vehicle issues). However, the back-to-back tests in August 2025 suggest either a rushed attempt to pass the vehicle before a deadline or a test centre error, as no defects were logged. The lack of advisories or repeated faults implies the core systems—brakes, suspension, exhaust, and structural integrity—have not deteriorated significantly, but the abrupt retest warrants scrutiny of whether the vehicle was driven between tests or if the failure was purely administrative. The recorded mileage of 74,591 miles at the latest test aligns with a steady annual average of approximately 7,459 miles, which is typical for a vehicle of this age and class. There are no evident gaps in usage that would suggest prolonged neglect, nor is there rapid acceleration in mileage that would indicate excessive wear. The most notable pattern is the identical mileage on consecutive tests in August 2025, which could imply the vehicle was not driven between those dates—a detail worth confirming with the seller. The previous tests in 2024 and 2023 also show consistent mileage increments, suggesting the vehicle has been used regularly without extreme mileage spikes or prolonged inactivity. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of the suspension components, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, as these are common wear points on this model. The brakes—while not flagged in the MOT—should be checked for uneven pad thickness or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle was driven between the 2025 tests. Tyre condition is another critical area; failing twice on tread depth (if implied by the retest) would suggest basic maintenance may have been overlooked. Finally, inspect the underbody for corrosion around the wheel arches and sills, as this is a frequent issue on Citroën models of this era. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are flawless, so visual and functional checks are essential.