2010 Hyundai I30 1.4L Petrol · EA10 ADV

The Hyundai i30’s most recent MOT test on 2025-05-28 confirms it remains roadworthy, though the immediate preceding test on 2025-05-27—just one day prior—was a failure without recorded defects. This anomaly suggests either a rare administrative oversight or a minor, non-critical issue resolved between tests. The broader trend over the past three years shows consistency, with no recurring mechanical failures or advisories. However, the repeated failures in June 2023 and May 2025, both at similar mileages (56,152 and 64,736 respectively), imply either a test centre error or a pattern of last-minute repairs. The vehicle’s current status is technically compliant, but the irregularities warrant scrutiny of what may have been hastily addressed. The recorded mileage of 64,736 miles over 16 years equates to approximately 4,046 miles annually, which is unusually low for a vehicle of this age. The gap between the 2023 and 2024 tests—spanning 11 months with just 3,882 miles logged—suggests prolonged periods of inactivity. This could indicate storage rather than active use, potentially accelerating wear on fluids, seals, and suspension components. The lack of significant mileage jumps also means consumables like brake pads, tyres, and wiper blades may not have been replaced as frequently as recommended, though the MOT record does not detail these. The most recent test’s proximity to the current date (just over two years old) is acceptable, but the irregular failure pattern raises questions about whether underlying issues were consistently overlooked. Given the absence of specific defect codes in the MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of suspension integrity, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, which are common wear points on this model. The repeated failures at similar mileages hint at potential brake system inconsistencies—check for uneven wear on discs or caliper binding, especially if the vehicle was stored with brake fluid degradation. Tyre tread depth and condition should be verified, as failing twice on this criterion in the past suggests basic maintenance may have been neglected. Finally, assess for corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as static periods can accelerate rust progression. While the MOT record shows no structural failures, visual confirmation of these areas is essential given the vehicle’s age and low mileage pattern.