2022 Toyota C-HR 1.8L Hybrid electric · AF22 ACO

The most recent DVSA MOT test on 2 March 2026 resulted in a Pass, accompanied by an advisory noting that the offside front protective arch guard is missing. While the vehicle achieved a current pass certificate, it is worth observing that the same date also recorded a fail prior to the pass, with major defects cited against both rear tyres for cuts exceeding the permitted depth and reaching the ply or cords, alongside a PRS for an ineffective nearside front windscreen wiper. The maintenance trend across the two test cycles is broadly stable but with a recurrent issue concerning the windscreen wiper performance, which was also failed with a PRS on 8 March 2025. The persistent offside front arch guard advisory indicates either that the component is a non-structural cosmetic element which the keeper has elected not to replace, or that it has been dislodged and lost over time, neither of which directly affects roadworthiness but may suggest light cosmetic neglect. With a recorded mileage of 34,630 miles over approximately four years, the vehicle is averaging around 8,658 miles annually, which is broadly typical for a car of its age and segment. This level of usage suggests moderate wear on consumables such as tyres, brake pads and discs, and the drivetrain has been worked sufficiently to prevent issues associated with prolonged standing. There is no evidence in the MOT record of significant mileage gaps between tests, and the progression of test dates is consistent with regular use. Buyers should expect that items such as tyres and brake friction materials will have experienced normal service life wear and may require attention within the next 12 to 24 months depending on driving conditions. Given the repeated PRS failures for the windscreen wiper not clearing the windscreen effectively, it is strongly advisable to physically inspect the wiper blades and the wiper mechanism before purchase. Look for perished, cracked, or hardened rubber blades, ensure the arms sit flat against the screen, and test both the driver and passenger side wipe pattern for streaking or unwiped arcs. On a test drive, operate the wash-wipe system and observe whether the blades smear or chatter, and verify that the wiper park position returns correctly. If the issue has been recurring over two consecutive MOTs, it may indicate a deteriorated wiper linkage, a fatigued blade return spring, or simply the cumulative effect of aged wiper rubber which a thorough replacement should resolve. Regarding the major tyre defects recorded at the most recent test, although the vehicle subsequently passed, this suggests both rear tyres were replaced or repaired just prior to the pass being issued. Inspect all four tyres for age-related sidewall perishing and cracking, particularly on the inner shoulder which is not always visible from a quick walkaround, and verify that the replacements are of matching size, load rating, and speed index on the same axle. Even at moderate annual mileage, a four year old vehicle should have the 12V battery health assessed, as batteries in this age bracket frequently begin to hold reduced charge, especially if the vehicle has been subject to short journeys. Furthermore, confirm the service book history for time-based replacements of brake fluid, coolant, and the hybrid system coolant if applicable, and request evidence of a recent inspection of the rear brake calipers for binding due to infrequent handbrake use, which is a common concern on lightly used or periodically parked vehicles of this type.