Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid
Outstanding Recall

2010 Chrysler Grand Voyager 2.8L Diesel · DU10 XGS

DU10 XGS

2010 Chrysler Grand Voyager (2.8L, diesel). First registered 01/03/2010. Recorded mileage 88,473 miles. MOT valid until 18/10/2026. Taxed until 01/04/2027. A manufacturer safety recall is currently outstanding.

Make & Model
CHRYSLER GRAND VOYAGER
Year / Origin
2010 · Shrewsbury
Safety Recall
Recall Notice
MOT Status
Valid until 18/10/2026
Road Tax
Taxed (01/04/2027)
Recorded Mileage
88,473 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Non-Compliant (Pre-Euro 6 Diesel)
Fuel & Engine
DIESEL · 2.8L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults

Outstanding Safety Recall Notice

Action Required

Official DVSA telemetry indicates this vehicle has an unaddressed manufacturer safety recall. Remedial repairs are legally required to be carried out 100% free of charge by an authorised main dealer.

MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 18/10/2026
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/04/2027
Fuel Type
DIESEL
Year
2010
Engine
2777cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The 2010 Chrysler Grand Voyager currently holds a valid MOT pass dated 20 October 2025 at 88,473 miles, but the maintenance trend is mixed and warrants caution. The most recent test passed with four advisories, including a corroded rear brake pipe, worn rear axle swivel bushes, and cracking rear tyres. Just one month prior, on 23 September 2025, the same vehicle failed with serious defects: both rear parking brakes were inoperative, rear brake discs were significantly worn, the handbrake lever was slipping off, and critically, the offside rear suspension mounting area was excessively corroded with significantly reduced structural strength. The fact that the September failure items do not appear in the October pass suggests repairs were carried out between tests, but the rapid turnaround raises questions about the quality and thoroughness of those fixes. The structural corrosion advisory from the failure was not carried forward as a pass item, yet corrosion of this nature rarely resolves fully without proper treatment. The mileage pattern is unusual and inconsistent. Between the September 2023 test at 77,231 miles and the September 2024 test at 80,147 miles, the vehicle covered just 2,916 miles in twelve months. Yet between September 2024 at 80,147 miles and the October 2025 tests at 88,473 miles, the vehicle accumulated 8,326 miles in roughly thirteen months. The recorded mileage has remained static at 88,473 across both the September 2025 failure and the October 2025 pass, which is physically impossible unless the mileage was incorrectly recorded or the vehicle was not driven between those two dates. This discrepancy undermines confidence in the odometer reading and suggests potential mileage irregularities that a buyer must investigate before purchase. Buyers should conduct a thorough in-person inspection focused on the rear suspension and brake system. The repeated appearance of rear brake pipe corrosion across multiple tests, combined with binding rear brakes and worn rear discs flagged in September 2025, points to a chronic issue with the rear braking circuit, possibly exacerbated by the vehicle standing for extended periods. The excessive corrosion noted at the offside rear suspension mounting area during the failure test is the most concerning finding. Structural corrosion in suspension mounting points directly affects vehicle integrity and must be inspected by a qualified mechanic with the vehicle on a lift. The handbrake lever slipping off during the September test also demands verification that the replacement lever and cable are functioning correctly and holding the vehicle on a gradient. Beyond the rear end, the recurring advisory for a frayed offside front seat belt webbing appears in tests dating back to September 2024 and remains unresolved. A damaged seat belt is a direct safety defect that should have been replaced, not repeatedly noted. The persistent rear tyre cracking and perishing across multiple tests suggests the vehicle may spend considerable time stationary or exposed to the elements, accelerating rubber degradation. A buyer should check the date codes on all tyres, inspect the underside for fresh repairs following the September failure, and verify the MOT mileage anomaly with service records or a HPI check before committing to purchase.

DU10 XGS Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Outstanding manufacturer safety recall notice
  • Latest MOT passed on 20/10/2025
  • 88,473 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 4 defects noted at the latest MOT

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
55
/ 100 · Below Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Below Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
! Older vehicle
✗ Outstanding recall notice
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for DU10XGS

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges
Recall Notice Outstanding

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Reliability & Known Issues

Known faults for Chrysler Chrysler Grand Voyager

Our database tracks 3 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.

DU10 XGS Mileage History

  1. 21/09/202377,231 mi
  2. 30/09/202480,147 mi+2,916 mi
  3. 30/09/202480,147 mi
  4. 23/09/202588,473 mi+8,326 mi
  5. 20/10/202588,473 mi

Average of roughly 5,405 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

DU10 XGS MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 15 Jun 2026, 22:27
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2010 Chrysler Grand Voyager (DU10 XGS) between September 2023 and October 2025.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 20 October 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (11 issues), Lighting (6 issues), Tyres (5 issues), Bodywork (2 issues), Suspension (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 17 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Brake lever excessively worn handbrake slipping off (1.1.15 (b))”; “Rear Brake disc significantly and obviously worn OS & NS (1.1.14 (a) (i))”; “Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural streng”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY