2011 Ford Fiesta 1.4L Petrol · GL60 RNF

A pattern of clean pass results across multiple test dates, with two specific failures on the record that were not accompanied by recorded defect notes, suggests this Fiesta has maintained a generally sound roadworthiness profile rather than displaying the chronic advisory or corrosion issues typical of high-mileage superminis of this era. The most recent MOT on 14 June 2025 was a pass with no defects recorded, following a failed test twelve days earlier on 02 June 2025 that again showed no defect entries, which is unusual and may indicate a retest after a rectification that addressed an item examiner recorded offline or a previously identified issue subsequently resolved. The earlier test on 29 May 2024 produced an identical pass-then-fail sequence within the same day, again with no defect notes logged, reinforcing the impression that any failures were minor and corrected promptly rather than reflecting structural or mechanical deterioration. The pass dated 12 April 2023 completes a three-year history in which the vehicle consistently met MOT standards, with no advisories accumulating across any test entry. With 145,719 miles recorded over approximately fifteen years, the Fiesta averages around 9,715 miles annually, which is broadly typical for a vehicle of its age and segment and points to steady, regular use rather than the low-mileage short-journey profile that accelerates certain wear mechanisms. There are no significant gaps between test dates that would suggest long periods off the road, and the consistent year-on-year testing pattern combined with the mileage progression implies the car has been in continuous service, supporting the likelihood of a warmed-through engine, functional drivetrain, and properly circulated operating fluids. The mileage is substantial for a 2011 Fiesta, meaning consumables such as brake components, tyres, and suspension linkages will have undergone multiple replacement intervals during the vehicle's life, though the absence of advisory notes on the record suggests these renewals have been carried out as required. Buyers should be mindful that higher-mileage Fiestas of this generation often exhibit wear on suspension bushes, engine mountings, and clutch components as cumulative use takes its toll, even where formal test entries remain clean. On a physical inspection, particular attention should be paid to the front suspension assembly, particularly the lower wishbone bushes, anti-roll bar drop links, and the front subframe mounting points, as these are known weak points on the MK7 Fiesta platform and can develop play without necessarily triggering an MOT advisory if the wear has not yet progressed beyond test thresholds. Listen for clonking noises from the front end over speed humps and uneven road surfaces, and check for uneven tyre wear across the front axle, which can indicate worn bushes or alignment drift. Inspect the rear axle beam mounting points and the trailing arm bushes for cracking, as these components degrade with age and mileage even on otherwise well-maintained examples, and feel for any vagueness or wandering from the steering on the test drive which could point to worn tie-rod ends or top mount deterioration. Given the absence of recorded advisories, there is no specific brake, exhaust, or corrosion history to target from the MOT file, so a prospective buyer should conduct a general but thorough appraisal of the braking system, including checking for binding calipers by running a gloved hand across each wheel rim after a short drive to identify excessive heat, and examining the rear drum brake mechanisms for seized adjusters or weak shoe return springs. Verify that the clutch operates smoothly without judder or slipping under hard acceleration in higher gears, and confirm that the engine starts promptly from cold without excessive smoke or hesitation, as timing chain stretch on the 1.25 or 1.4 Duratec units fitted to this model can manifest as a rattling noise on startup that worsens with age and mileage. A corroborating service history, particularly evidence of cambelt replacement at the recommended interval, would significantly strengthen confidence in the long-term mechanical prospects of this otherwise consistently roadworthy vehicle.