2014 Peugeot 108 1.2L Petrol · LE04 EMA

A recurring theme of front brake wear, headlamp electrical faults, and rear tyre deterioration dominates the MOT history of this 2014 Peugeot 108, with three failures recorded across four test cycles since 2022. The most recent event on 20 April 2026 saw the vehicle fail on a dangerously worn offside front inner tyre below the 1.6mm tread limit and dangerously thin front brake pads under 1.5mm, before passing the same day after rectification, with a persistent nearside rear tyre cracking advisory still noted. Looking back over the full sequence, the 2024 test produced a particularly serious cluster of dangerous and major defects, including significantly worn front brake discs, brake pads under 1.5mm, and failed offside front headlamp on both dipped and main beam. Headlamp failures recurred again in 2025 on the nearside front dipped beam, alongside a deep cut to the offside front tyre exposing ply or cords. The 2023 test passed with multiple advisories flagging early-stage brake pad wear, pitted front brake discs, and cracking to both rear tyres, while the 2022 entry is the only clean test in the record. The overall trajectory is one of repeated and escalating braking and lighting concerns, with tyre degradation appearing at almost every test. Recorded mileage of 94,173 miles across twelve years equates to an annual accumulation of roughly 7,848 miles, which sits within typical parameters for a city-oriented Peugeot 108 of this age. The mileage progression between tests appears broadly consistent rather than showing dramatic spikes or extended gaps, suggesting the vehicle has remained in regular use throughout its life on the road. With annual mileage in this range, the wear pattern recorded is consistent with what one would expect on a frequently-driven small hatchback, particularly in terms of consumable items such as brake friction material and tyres. The braking components in particular show a wear cycle consistent with urban stop-start driving rather than motorway accumulation, which tends to accelerate pad and disc wear more aggressively. No extended periods off the road are evident from the MOT cadence, with tests recorded annually from 2022 onwards. For a prospective buyer, the brake system warrants the closest physical inspection given the repeated front pad and disc advisories culminating in a dangerous failure in 2026. On a test drive, listen for any metallic grinding or squealing from the front wheels, feel for pedal judder or vibration under firm braking, and check for the vehicle pulling to one side, which could indicate uneven pad wear or a binding caliper. Confirm the replacement pads have been fitted with adequate material thickness and inspect the front discs through the wheels for scoring, lipping, or a blue heat-tinted finish that suggests recent heavy use. Given the headlamp failures in both 2024 and 2025, both front lamps should be physically checked for correct operation on dipped and main beam, and the wiring and connector condition inspected for corrosion or loose contacts, which is a known issue on ageing Peugeot 108s. The tyres deserve equal scrutiny because nearside rear cracking or perishing has been flagged at every single test in the record, with the offside rear joining the advisory list from 2023 onwards. On inspection, examine both rear tyres closely for sidewall cracking, tread separation, or bulges, and verify the offside front inner tread depth well clear of the 1.6mm legal minimum. Given the vehicle age of twelve years, also check the spare wheel or inflation kit condition and inspect the wheel rims for kerb damage. Beyond the flagged items, the typical Peugeot 108 weaknesses to verify on a physical viewing include coolant leaks from the thermostat housing, exhaust corrosion around the rear silencer and mounting rubbers, and wear in the front suspension top mounts and anti-roll bar bushes, which can produce knocking over uneven road surfaces. With the brake and tyre concerns representing the principal recorded risk areas, a pre-purchase inspection at a garage with the vehicle raised on a ramp would be advisable to confirm the undercarriage condition before commitment.