2013 Nissan Juke 1.5L Diesel · LL63 ABV

The 2013 Nissan Juke’s most recent MOT test on 2026-04-02 resulted in a failure, though no specific defects were recorded—an anomaly that raises immediate concern. The pattern of repeated failures without documented issues suggests either administrative errors in the MOT process or a vehicle that has slipped through testing with undetected critical faults. The last passing test occurred in March 2025, followed by two consecutive failures in December 2023 and February 2025, indicating a lack of consistent roadworthiness. Buyers should treat this as a red flag, as failures without explanations often mask unresolved mechanical or structural issues. The recorded mileage of 155,482 miles over approximately 13 years reflects an average of around 12,000 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. However, the gaps between tests are irregular, with a notable 11-month interval between the 2025-03-05 pass and the 2025-02-12 failure, followed by another 14-month gap before the 2026-04-02 failure. This inconsistency implies either erratic ownership or a reluctance to undergo regular inspections. The lack of progressive mileage accumulation—such as a sudden spike—suggests the vehicle has not been driven excessively, but the repeated failures indicate poor maintenance discipline rather than extreme wear. Given the history, a prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension components, particularly the coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age and mileage. The repeated failures without defects also warrant scrutiny of the braking system, including brake discs, calipers, and master cylinder, for signs of binding or excessive wear. Structural integrity, especially around wheel arches and sills, should be checked for corrosion, as this is a critical but often overlooked issue in older Nissan models. The absence of advisories in past tests makes it harder to predict specific weaknesses, but the pattern suggests the vehicle may have been driven with deferred maintenance. Independent verification of these areas is essential.