2016 Mazda 6 2.2L Diesel · LL65 UGT

The vehicle achieved an MOT pass on 19 February 2026, although this followed an earlier failure on the same date owing to a non-functioning nearside front position lamp, which is typically a straightforward bulb replacement rather than a mechanical concern. Beyond that, four advisories were recorded at this test and have been carried forward consistently over recent years, indicating a maintenance profile that is neither deteriorating nor improving but rather showing steady wear progression. Front brake disc wear has been flagged repeatedly, rear suspension and sub-frame corrosion have been acknowledged, and fluctuating front brake service performance has been noted, all of which warrant close attention. Taken as a whole, the trend suggests a car that has been reasonably maintained but is now entering the phase of its life where corrosion and braking components require proactive management. With 118,483 miles recorded on a ten-year-old vehicle, the annual average of approximately 11,848 miles is broadly typical and indicates consistent use rather than long periods of standing. This is mechanically favourable, as regular driving tends to keep sealing components lubricated, prevents severe corrosion from developing on brake discs and calipers, and reduces the risk of battery and drivetrain issues associated with infrequent use. There are no apparent gaps in the MOT history that would suggest extended periods off the road, and the steady accumulation of mileage provides reassurance that mechanical systems have been working under normal load conditions throughout the vehicle's life. The recurring advisories relating to front brake discs, noted in 2024 and again in 2026, along with the fluctuating front brake service observation, suggest the discs are nearing the end of their service life. On a test drive, the buyer should listen for any brake shudder through the steering wheel under firm application, feel for any pulling to one side, and listen for grinding or squealing that could indicate worn pads contacting scored disc surfaces. Front brake pads were also flagged as wearing thin in 2025, so a thorough inspection of pad material thickness and disc run-out using a dial gauge at a garage would be prudent. Given that brake discs and pads are typically replaced in pairs, budgeting for a complete front brake refurbishment including discs and pads should be anticipated in the near term. The rear suspension advisories are more concerning from a structural longevity standpoint. The nearside rear suspension arm attachment bracket and mounting corrosion, alongside general rear suspension corrosion and rear sub-frame surface corrosion, are classic age-related issues on a ten-year-old Mazda 6 operating in UK conditions where road salt is prevalent. While the examiner has judged these not seriously weakened at present, corrosion of this nature progresses and may eventually require welding repairs or replacement of the affected arms. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking noises from the rear over uneven surfaces, speed humps, or when changing direction, which would indicate worn bushes or play in the corroded joints. Additionally, the advisories on front suspension arm rear bushes splitting from 2024 should be confirmed as addressed, and the entire underbody, including the rear sub-frame and suspension components, should be inspected for any through-corrosion. Given the vehicle's age and mileage, it would also be wise to verify the timing belt or chain service interval compliance, confirm full brake fluid and coolant changes in line with manufacturer schedules, and inspect the tyres not only for tread depth but also for sidewall cracking or perishing consistent with age, even if the tread remains legal.