2012 Alfa Romeo Mito 1.4L Petrol · LS12 SXX

The Alfa Romeo Mito’s most recent MOT history, spanning February 2024 to February 2026, demonstrates a stable roadworthiness trend with no recurring defects or advisories. The vehicle passed both tests in 2025 and 2026 without fail, and the sole failures in 2024 and 2026 were anomalies—likely due to administrative errors rather than mechanical issues—since no defects were recorded. This suggests the vehicle has consistently met MOT standards, though the repeated retesting at identical mileages raises suspicion of procedural irregularities rather than genuine mechanical concerns. The February 2026 test, just five months ago, confirms the car remains legally compliant, but the lack of advisories or warnings means critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers have not been flagged for deterioration. The recorded mileage of 43,904 miles over nearly 14 years—roughly 3,136 miles annually—indicates unusually light usage for a vehicle of this age. The gap between tests is consistent, with no rapid mileage accumulation or prolonged periods of inactivity, which could have accelerated wear. The 2024 retest at 41,268 miles, just three days before the pass at 41,271 miles, suggests either a scheduling oversight or a temporary hold unrelated to the vehicle’s condition. There is no evidence of aggressive driving or neglect, but the low mileage also means some components may have exceeded their expected service life without significant use, particularly in areas prone to slow degradation like suspension mounts or brake master cylinders. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of suspension integrity, focusing on the condition of rear suspension bushes and coil springs—common failure points in Alfas—alongside brake calipers and discs for signs of uneven wear or binding. The absence of advisories does not preclude hidden corrosion, particularly in the wheel arches, subframe, or sills, where salt ingress over time can compromise structural integrity. Tyre tread depth, despite no MOT failures, should be verified, as the lack of recent wear could indicate underinflation or uneven loading. Finally, the engine bay should be checked for oil leaks or degraded hoses, as the vehicle’s age increases the risk of internal component fatigue. While the MOT record suggests no immediate red flags, these areas warrant thorough scrutiny.