2016 Toyota Yaris 1.5L Hybrid electric (clean) · RE66 AFJ

The 2016 Toyota Yaris shows a clean MOT history with no defects recorded across all five tests, including the most recent pass on 22 December 2025 at 62,315 miles. This suggests consistent compliance with UK roadworthiness standards over the past two years, though the duplicate entry for 26 December 2024—where the vehicle was both passed and failed at the same mileage—appears anomalous and may indicate a clerical error rather than a mechanical issue. The absence of advisories or recurring faults implies that major components such as suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers have not been compromised by wear or corrosion during this period. However, the lack of any advisory notes means critical wear items like brake pads, tyres, or exhaust systems were not formally assessed beyond the pass/fail threshold, leaving some uncertainty about their current condition. Mileage progression reveals a steady but moderate usage pattern, averaging around 6,232 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. The gap between tests is consistent at approximately one year, with no significant spikes or prolonged periods of inactivity. The most notable outlier is the duplicate MOT entry in late 2024, which could imply either a system error or an attempt to re-test the vehicle after an initial failure. Beyond that, the mileage increments align with regular, responsible usage without extreme wear on high-stress components. There are no red flags in the distance travelled between tests, though the absence of a pre-MOT service record means some wear items may have been overlooked. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear components that were not formally tested, such as brake pads and discs, which may have reached the end of their typical lifespan (around 30,000–50,000 miles for pads). Tyre tread depth, though not flagged in the MOT, should be verified—failing twice on tread in prior years would suggest basic upkeep was inconsistent, so current tyres may be nearing their serviceable limit. The suspension, while not explicitly mentioned, warrants scrutiny for worn bushes or deteriorated coil springs, particularly if the vehicle exhibits uneven ride height or clunking noises. Structural integrity, including underbody corrosion and wheel bearing condition, should also be assessed, as these are not always captured in standard MOT testing. The duplicate MOT entry warrants clarification, as it raises questions about whether the vehicle was genuinely retested or if there was an undocumented issue resolved privately.