2015 Peugeot 208 1.2L Petrol · RF15 NGV

The 2015 Peugeot 208’s most recent MOT tests—conducted just four months ago on 6 March 2026—show an unusual pattern of consecutive pass/fail entries at identical mileages (55,789 miles), which is highly irregular and suggests either a technical anomaly in the DVSA system or a deliberate misfiling. Beyond this, the vehicle’s last clean pass occurred in March 2024 at 44,500 miles, followed by a flawless test in February 2025 at 51,041 miles, indicating no recurring mechanical failures over the past two years. The absence of advisories or defects in any of these records implies the tester did not identify any critical issues requiring immediate attention during those inspections, though the double-entry anomaly warrants verification. The vehicle’s mileage progression—averaging just over 5,000 miles annually—is unusually low for its age, particularly given the 15-month gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests (covering 6,541 miles) and the 11-month gap between the 2025 and 2026 tests (covering 4,748 miles). Such sparse usage may reduce wear on high-mileage components like suspension bushes or drivetrain fluids, but it also raises questions about whether the vehicle has been stored improperly, leading to potential corrosion or degraded rubber seals. The lack of intermediate MOTs or service records means there’s no evidence of proactive maintenance between these tests, which could leave hidden issues undetected. Given the clean MOT history outside the 2026 anomaly, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension components—particularly rear bushes and coil springs—due to the vehicle’s age and low mileage, as these can degrade even with minimal use. The brakes, while not flagged in past tests, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods. Structural integrity is another concern; inspect the wheel arches, sills, and underbody for corrosion, as prolonged storage without movement can accelerate rust formation. Finally, verify the double-entry discrepancy with the DVSA or seller, as this inconsistency could indicate a data error or an unresolved issue from the most recent test.