2013 Toyota Auris 1.6L Petrol · WG63 NBL

This Toyota Auris presents a clean and stable MOT history, with the most recent test on 23 December 2025 at 59,243 miles showing no defects or advisories whatsoever. The consistency extends back through all five recorded tests—each passing without fail—including the July 2025 test at 57,449 miles and the July 2024 test at 54,091 miles . There is no evidence of recurring issues, mechanical degradation, or even minor advisories that might suggest deferred maintenance. The absence of any recorded faults in over a year of testing, particularly given the vehicle’s age, strongly indicates that the car has either been meticulously maintained or, alternatively, stored with minimal use. The lack of advisories on critical systems—such as brakes, suspension, or structural integrity—reduces immediate concerns, though this does not preclude the need for a thorough pre-purchase inspection. The mileage accumulation of 4,557 miles per year over the past decade is notably low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either infrequent use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the July 2024 test (54,091 miles) and the July 2025 test (57,449 miles) covers just 3,358 miles in 12 months , which is well below average. Similarly, the 4,964-mile jump between the July 2023 (49,620 miles) and July 2024 tests indicates sporadic driving rather than consistent annual mileage. While low mileage typically reduces wear on consumables, it can also mask hidden issues if fluids (oils, brake fluid, coolant) have not been regularly renewed. The lack of recorded advisories on tyre condition or fluid levels in any test is unusual for a vehicle this age, raising the possibility that the car has been stored rather than actively driven—or that maintenance has been exceptionally rigorous. Given the absence of MOT advisories, a buyer should still prioritise a pre-purchase inspection focusing on components not routinely checked in standard tests. Particular attention should be given to brake system health , including the condition of rear brake pads, calipers, and discs , as binding brakes were not recorded but could still develop due to inactivity. The suspension bushes, coil springs, and anti-roll bars should be checked for dryness, cracking, or excessive wear, as these are not always flagged unless visibly deteriorated. Exhaust emissions —though not directly tested in recent years—may benefit from a visual inspection for leaks or corrosion, especially if the car has been stored in damp conditions. Rust penetration in high-stress areas (sills, wheel arches, underbody) should be scrutinised, as low-mileage vehicles are sometimes left exposed without regular movement to prevent corrosion. Finally, while the MOT history is flawless, the lack of recorded advisories on tyre tread depth or wiper blade condition is striking for a vehicle this age. Buyers should verify that tyres have been rotated and renewed appropriately , as standing mileage can lead to uneven wear or hidden damage. Fluid levels —engine oil, brake fluid, coolant, and power steering fluid—should be checked for degradation or contamination, as stagnant fluids can degrade over time. The battery health may also warrant inspection, given the vehicle’s infrequent use. While the MOT record suggests a well-kept example, these areas remain the most likely to reveal deferred maintenance or hidden issues.