Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid

2005 Rover 75 1.8L Petrol · XT02 BWT

XT02 BWT

2005 Rover 75 (1.8L, petrol). First registered 01/01/2005. Recorded mileage 64,341 miles. MOT valid until 09/02/2027.

Make & Model
ROVER 75
Year / Origin
2005 · Personal Export
MOT Status
Valid until 09/02/2027
Road Tax
Untaxed (10/06/2026)
Recorded Mileage
64,341 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Non-Compliant (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
PETROL · 1.8L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 09/02/2027
Tax Status
Untaxed
Tax due 10/06/2026
Fuel Type
PETROL
Year
2005
Engine
1796cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness profile with a worsening trend in front suspension and braking system integrity. While it passed the most recent test in February 2026 at 64,341 miles, this result followed a significant failure just one month prior. The tester flagged a worn offside front inner track rod end ball joint and multiple tyres reaching the legal limit, indicating that while reactive repairs were made, comprehensive maintenance remains lacking. The recurring nature of steering and suspension faults suggests the owner is responding only to failures rather than following a preventative maintenance schedule. The mileage history is notably low for a 21-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,000 miles per year. However, the data shows a recent spike in activity. Between February 2024 at 41,421 miles and February 2026 at 64,341 miles, the car covered over 23,000 miles in two years. This sudden shift from low-frequency use often leads to the degradation of rubber components, which is evidenced by the perishing and cracking of tyres noted in early 2025 and the persistent corrosion on the brake pipes. A buyer must prioritize the front suspension geometry and braking lines during a physical inspection. The record repeatedly highlights play in the steering rack inner joints, track rod ends, and suspension arm bushes. More critically, the persistent excessive corrosion on the nearside front brake pipe is a high-risk issue that appeared in both 2025 and 2026, requiring verification that it has been replaced rather than merely cleaned. Furthermore, the history of perishing tyres despite low mileage suggests the vehicle may have sat for long periods, which often conceals hidden rust on the chassis or perished components not captured by the MOT tester.

XT02 BWT Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 03/02/2026
  • 64,341 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 3 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring tyres items (8 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
75
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for XT02BWT

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Reliability & Known Issues

Known faults for Rover Rover 75

Our database tracks 4 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.

XT02 BWT Mileage History

  1. 02/02/202441,421 mi
  2. 24/01/202549,676 mi+8,255 mi
  3. 10/02/202549,681 mi+5 mi
  4. 12/01/202663,165 mi+13,484 mi
  5. 03/02/202664,341 mi+1,176 mi

Average of roughly 11,437 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

XT02 BWT MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 22 Jun 2026, 15:49
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2005 Rover 75 (XT02 BWT) between February 2024 and February 2026.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 03 February 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (8 issues), Lighting (3 issues), Steering (3 issues), Brakes (3 issues), Suspension (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 14 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))”; “Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))”; “Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY