2016 Nissan Pulsar 1.5L Diesel · YA16 WHZ

The 2016 Nissan Pulsar has maintained a consistent MOT pass record across its most recent four tests, all conducted without any recorded defects. The most recent inspection on 28 May 2025—just over a year ago—confirmed the vehicle’s compliance with current roadworthiness standards, though it’s worth noting that the test was conducted at the maximum permissible mileage interval (12 months) rather than the standard 6-month cycle for vehicles over 10 years old. This suggests the previous owner adhered to the legal minimum rather than proactive maintenance scheduling, which could imply deferred attention to wear items like suspension bushes or brake components. The recorded mileage progression of approximately 8,077 miles annually is typical for a vehicle of this age, though the intervals between tests reveal a pattern of delayed servicing. The gap between the 2022 and 2023 tests spans 11 months, with 5,685 miles logged, while the 2023–2024 interval covers 12 months and 7,059 miles. This irregularity may reflect inconsistent ownership or a reluctance to engage with routine servicing, which could accelerate wear on high-friction parts. The absence of advisories or defects in any test implies no major mechanical failures were detected, but this does not preclude gradual degradation in areas like coil springs, steering dampers, or brake caliper binding—common issues in this mileage bracket. Given the lack of recorded faults, a prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear coil springs and bushes, which often degrade unevenly in this model. The brakes, while not flagged in MOTs, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been subjected to heavy braking loads. Corrosion in wheel arches, subframe, or sills—common in high-mileage Pulsars—must be assessed, as structural integrity is not tested during MOTs. Finally, the exhaust system should be examined for leaks or excessive rust, as emissions compliance was never explicitly tested in these records. The vehicle’s history suggests it has been driven responsibly, but critical wear items demand verification beyond the MOT’s scope.