2015 Ford Grand C-MAX 1.5L Diesel · LL65 ZTE

The 2015 Ford Grand C-Max presents a mixed but largely stable roadworthiness profile in its most recent MOT, though with clear signs of recurring brake wear that demand immediate attention. The April 2026 test at 119,008 miles passed, but the tester flagged all four brake pads—front and rear, both sides—as worn thin, marking a repeat of the same advisory seen in the July 2024 and July 2023 tests. This consistency suggests the pads have been neglected for at least two years, with no evidence of replacement between tests. While the vehicle passed without major defects in the intervening periods, the repeated advisories indicate a pattern of deferred maintenance, particularly on braking components, which could escalate into a serious safety risk if left unaddressed. Mileage accumulation has been steady and typical for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 10,800 miles annually since 2015. The most recent 12-month span—from July 2024 to April 2026—shows just under 2,000 miles logged, which aligns with the historical trend and rules out excessive or light usage as a primary factor in wear. The only outlier appears in the 2022-2023 period, where mileage jumped from 102,103 to 109,490 in roughly 12 months, though even this remains within reasonable bounds. The absence of major defects in the 2024 test, combined with the clean history prior to 2022, implies that while the car has been driven consistently, its maintenance has become increasingly reactive rather than preventive. For a buyer, the primary focus should be the brake system, given the persistent advisories across three consecutive MOTs. All four pads—front and rear—are due for replacement, and the calipers or hydraulic system may also require inspection to rule out binding or uneven wear. The 2022 test revealed uneven tyre wear on the rear tyres, which could point to suspension issues such as worn bushes or misaligned wheels; a thorough check of the rear track rod ends, coil springs, and wheel bearings is advisable. Structural integrity appears sound, with no corrosion or damage noted in the recent records, but a close examination of the undercarriage, especially around wheel arches and suspension mounts, would confirm this. Given the lack of major defects, the vehicle’s mechanical core seems intact, but the brake and tyre history underscores the need for swift, targeted intervention before minor issues compound into costly repairs.