2014 Citroen C4 1.6L Diesel · CV64 JZX

The most recent MOT test on 2025-10-16 confirms this Citroën C4 passed without defects, following a single failed test on 2025-10-10—an unusual anomaly given the otherwise consistent passing history. The trend remains stable, with no recurring advisories or defects across five consecutive tests since 2022. The 2025 failure, however, warrants scrutiny, as it stands alone without explanation in the record, suggesting either a temporary oversight or an isolated issue that was rectified before the subsequent pass. No structural or safety-critical components appear to have been repeatedly at risk, though the absence of advisories in earlier tests means some wear may have gone unnoticed until the 2025 window. The vehicle’s mileage of 105,365 miles over 12 years aligns with typical usage patterns for its age, averaging around 8,780 miles annually. There are no significant gaps or spikes in the record to indicate prolonged neglect or aggressive driving, though the 2024-2025 period shows a slight acceleration—from 52,000 to 105,365 miles—without corresponding MOT failures, which could imply either improved maintenance or deferred servicing. The lack of mileage data between tests means wear on high-usage components like suspension bushes, brake calipers, and timing belt (if applicable) cannot be precisely timed, but the stable passing history suggests these areas were likely addressed when needed. A buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension geometry, particularly the rear bushings and coil springs, given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The 2025 failure—despite passing the subsequent test—raises caution around brake systems, as binding calipers or uneven wear could have been the cause. Corrosion checks are essential, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are prone to deterioration in a C4 of this vintage. Finally, the exhaust system should be examined for leaks or excessive rust, as emissions-related failures are not recorded but could indicate broader neglect. No advisories in past tests mean some wear may have been overlooked, so thoroughness in these areas is critical.