2016 Audi A5 2.0L Diesel · FE16 EVF

The 2016 Audi A5 presents a strong and improving maintenance trend, culminating in a completely clean pass on 14 March 2026 at 108,360 miles with zero defects recorded. This is a significant turnaround from the advisory-laden tests of earlier years. The most recent result indicates that any previously flagged minor issues have been addressed, and the vehicle currently meets all DVSA standards for roadworthiness without any identified faults. The mileage accumulation is consistent and typical for a vehicle of this age, averaging approximately 10,836 miles per year. The record shows a steady climb from 52,969 miles in March 2022 to 108,360 miles by March 2026, with no unusual gaps or sudden spikes in usage. The annual testing pattern has been regular and uninterrupted, providing a reliable chronological picture of the vehicle's condition over the past four years. Historically, the tester flagged a light oil misting on the nearside rear shock absorber in March 2023 at 57,359 miles, a condition that typically indicates the beginning of seal degradation. The clean 2026 result suggests this component has either been replaced or has not progressed to a failure point. Buyers should still have the rear suspension inspected in person, paying close attention to shock absorber condition and any signs of fluid leakage, as misting can recur. The front registration plate deterioration noted in both 2022 and 2023 is a minor cosmetic matter, but a replacement plate should be fitted to remain compliant. The advisory on both front tyres being worn close to the legal limit in March 2022 at 52,969 miles points to a period where basic consumable upkeep may have been overlooked. With no tyre-related defects recorded since, it appears tyre maintenance has improved. A prospective buyer should still check the current tyre condition, tread depth, and sidewall integrity, as well as inspecting the brake discs and pads given the vehicle's age and mileage. The absence of any corrosion or structural advisories in the record is encouraging, but an underbody inspection remains prudent for a ten-year-old vehicle.