2015 Peugeot 308 1.2L Petrol · GD64 LZX

The most recent DVSA examination on 5 May 2026 returned a PASS, although it was not entirely clean, carrying forward three advisories relating to the front suspension and anti-roll bar geometry. The earlier test on 21 April 2026, just two weeks prior, resulted in a FAIL due to a dangerously under-tread nearside front tyre and a major defect concerning the offside front anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover, with both front suspension arm pin or bush wear advisories again recorded. Comparing the two most recent tests, the underlying wear issues have persisted across consecutive examinations and were severe enough at the April visit to warrant failure, indicating a deteriorating rather than stable condition in the front suspension and anti-roll bar assembly. The 2025 test was clean, but the cluster of front-end advisories now appearing consistently suggests that wear has progressed materially over the last twelve months and warrants close physical inspection. With recorded mileage of 126,760 miles over approximately eleven years, this Peugeot 308 is averaging around 11,500 miles per year, which is broadly typical for a vehicle of its age and consistent with regular daily use. There are no significant gaps in the MOT record that would suggest long periods of standing, which is positive from the perspective of avoiding calendar-related issues such as brake caliper seizure, exhaust corrosion, or moisture ingress into drivetrain components. However, the high absolute mileage means that the usual high-wear items including clutch, dual mass flywheel if manually operated, turbocharger and associated hosing, and engine mounts should already have been replaced or be approaching replacement, and any evidence of recent major mechanical expenditure should be verified through the service history. The recurring advisories on the nearside and offside front suspension arm pins or bushes indicate that the compliance bushes or pivot joints within the front lower arms are worn, a common failure point on Peugeot 308s of this generation due to the inherent softness of the rubber and the loading imposed on the front axle. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking from the front end particularly when traversing speed humps, uneven road surfaces, or when turning at low speed, and feel for imprecise steering response or wandering at higher speeds which would suggest the bushes have deteriorated beyond advisory tolerance. The worn ball joint on the front anti-roll bar linkage, combined with the failed dust cover noted in April, points toward the need for replacement of the drop links and possibly the anti-roll bar mounting bushes; continued use without rectification will typically result in increased body roll in handling and ultimately an MOT failure. Both front tyres have also been flagged recently, with one falling to a dangerous tread depth, indicating that the front axle is consuming tyres more rapidly than expected and potentially compounding the suspension wear through misalignment or uneven loading. Beyond the documented advisories, a prospective buyer should carry out a thorough physical inspection appropriate to the vehicle's age and accumulated mileage. Check the sidewalls of all four tyres for perishing or crazing, as eleven-year-old rubber can deteriorate even with adequate tread depth, and inspect the rear tyres particularly for inner shoulder wear which can indicate rear bush failure. Examine the brake discs for lipping and visible corrosion and verify that the handbrake holds firmly on an incline, as standing periods or infrequent use can lead to caliper slide pin seizure. Open the bonnet and check coolant, brake fluid and power steering fluid for condition and age, bearing in mind that brake fluid should ideally have been renewed every two years regardless of mileage, and inspect the 12V battery for date coding as original units are well beyond their expected service life. Finally, request evidence of cambelt and water pump replacement history as this Peugeot is due at typical manufacturer intervals, and verify a continuous service record with stamps or invoices to substantiate the maintenance trend suggested by the MOT history.