2015 Nissan Juke 1.6L Petrol · LF65 DFP

A clean DVSA record across five tests over the past four years paints a reassuring picture of mechanical roadworthiness for this 2015 Nissan Juke. The most recent examination on 7 January 2026 returned a pass with no advisories or defects recorded, and the preceding test on 31 December 2025 shows a fail entry with no defect details logged, which on the official MOT history viewer typically indicates a vehicle that was presented before its previous certificate expired, was rejected at the first attempt, then passed at the second test without any items being recorded against it. The two earlier passes in January 2023 and October 2022 likewise carry no advisories, meaning there is no documentary evidence of worn brake components, corroded suspension parts, deteriorating exhaust elements, or bodywork issues that would suggest ongoing deterioration. The overall trend is one of stable compliance, with no recurrence of any flagged item and no progressive worsening that would hint at a component approaching the end of its service life. Against an 11 year vehicle age, 54,123 miles equates to an average of roughly 4,920 miles per year, which sits well below the typical accumulation for a car of this vintage. There is, however, a notable gap in the test history between October 2022 and January 2023 on one side, and from January 2025 to December 2025 on the other, during which the vehicle may have covered very few miles or even been laid up for an extended period. Standing time of this nature allows moisture to collect in the underbonch area, brake callipers to seize through corrosion of the slider pins, tyres to develop flat spots, and seals to dry out, particularly on the rear drum brakes fitted to many Jukes of this generation. Light annual use also means the engine has not been regularly run up to full operating temperature for long durations, which can promote internal condensation in the oil and accelerate degradation of coolant hoses and rubber mountings. Conversely, the modest mileage suggests the clutch, dual mass flywheel, turbocharger and timing chain have not been subjected to high-cycle wear, all of which is favourable for a prospective buyer. Given the lack of specific advisories, a physical pre-purchase inspection should focus on the components most prone to age-related deterioration on this model rather than any item already flagged. On a test drive, listen carefully for clonking or knocking from the front suspension over speed humps and rough tarmac, particularly from the lower control arm bushes and front anti-roll bar drop links, as these are known to perish on Jukes of this age regardless of mileage. Apply the brakes firmly from around 40 mph and feel for any vibration through the steering wheel or pedal, which would indicate warped front discs; a sticking or dragging calliper often manifests as the vehicle pulling to one side under light braking. At low speed, turn the steering lock to lock and listen for any groan or binding from the electric power steering rack, a common Juke complaint. Check that the air conditioning produces consistent cold output, as compressor failure and refrigerant leaks are well documented on this model, and verify that all warning lamps extinguish promptly after start-up, paying particular attention to the airbag and emissions management lights. With the engine idling from cold, look for any excess smoke from the exhaust, particularly blue tinged vapour indicating oil burn past the piston rings or turbo seals, both of which become more likely on a higher mileage unit but should still be assessed. Inspect the underside carefully for any oil seepage from the sump gasket, cam chain cover, or rocker cover, and examine the subframe mounting points and suspension turrets for any bubbling or surface corrosion that could progress under future MOT scrutiny. Verify that all tyres are matching in make and tread depth, as a Juke standing on the same set of ageing tyres for several years may show sidewall cracking even with legal tread remaining. The two test entries within a single week in late 2025 and early 2026 deserve a direct question to the seller, as the second pass may have involved rectification work that was not recorded on the MOT but is relevant to your purchase decision; obtaining the corresponding repair invoice would confirm precisely what was addressed and provide reassurance that no underlying fault remains.