Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid
Check Service Records

2013 Lexus IS 2.5L Hybrid electric · LL63 FNC

LL63 FNC

2013 Lexus IS (2.5L, hybrid electric). First registered 01/12/2013. Recorded mileage 312,385 miles. MOT valid until 27/02/2027. Taxed until 01/04/2027.

Make & Model
LEXUS IS
Year / Origin
2013 · Wimbledon (South London)
MOT Status
Valid until 27/02/2027
Road Tax
Taxed (01/04/2027)
Recorded Mileage
312,385 mi
ULEZ Compliance
ULEZ Exempt (Zero Emissions)
Fuel & Engine
HYBRID ELECTRIC · 2.5L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 27/02/2027
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/04/2027
Fuel Type
HYBRID ELECTRIC
Year
2013
Engine
2493cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the maintenance history reveals a trend of reactive repairs rather than preventative care. While the most recent test in February 2026 at 312,385 miles passed without defects, it followed a failure on the same day. The tester flagged a malfunctioning tyre pressure monitoring system, incorrect headlamp aim, and an excessively twisted offside front brake hose. The fact that these issues were rectified immediately to secure a pass suggests the owner addresses mechanical faults only when necessitated by the legal testing process. The mileage profile is exceptionally high for a thirteen-year-old Lexus, averaging over 24,000 miles per annum. A particularly significant spike in usage occurred between January 2024 and February 2026, where the vehicle covered 155,651 miles in just two years. This rapid rate of accumulation suggests high-speed motorway use or heavy commercial application, which places extreme strain on drivetrain components, suspension bushings, and braking systems. The 2024 record shows all four tyres were worn to the legal limit or on the edges, indicating a maintenance cycle where consumables are pushed to their limit before replacement. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the suspension and braking geometry due to the extreme mileage. The twisted brake hose noted in February 2026 could indicate improper installation or mechanical binding issues that may lead to premature hose failure. You should check for signs of excessive wear on control arm bushes and shock absorbers, as the high mileage likely accelerates the degradation of rubber components. Given the rapid mileage accumulation, verifying the structural integrity of the chassis and the condition of the exhaust system is also vital, as high-mileage vehicles often suffer from hidden corrosion that requires constant monitoring.

LL63 FNC Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 28/02/2026
  • 312,385 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • No defects recorded at the latest MOT
  • Recurring tyres items (5 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
75
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for LL63FNC

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

LL63 FNC Mileage History

  1. 13/01/2023144,501 mi
  2. 20/01/2024156,734 mi+12,233 mi
  3. 17/01/2025285,617 mi+128,883 mi
  4. 28/02/2026312,385 mi+26,768 mi
  5. 28/02/2026312,385 mi

Average of roughly 53,683 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

LL63 FNC MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 16 Jun 2026, 03:45
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2013 Lexus Is (LL63 FNC) between January 2023 and February 2026.

The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 28 February 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (5 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Brakes (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 4 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Front Brake hose excessively twisted (1.1.12 (b) (ii))”; “Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”; “Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY