2017 Fiat 500 1.2L Petrol · AV67 VNS

The most recent MOT test on November 11, 2025, confirms the vehicle remains roadworthy with no defects recorded at 34,795 miles. Despite two consecutive retests in November 2024 and November 2023—each passing after an initial failure—the absence of repeated faults in the latest cycle suggests the vehicle has been maintained to meet minimum standards. However, the pattern of retests indicates the tester may have identified marginal conditions that required minor attention before passing, rather than systemic failures. No advisories or major defects have been logged in the past two years, which aligns with a stable roadworthiness trend, though the lack of pre-MOT servicing records means hidden wear cannot be confirmed. The recorded mileage of 34,795 miles over nine years—approximately 3,866 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either infrequent use or prolonged periods of storage. The gap between tests is consistent at around 12 months, with no sudden spikes in mileage between November 2023 and November 2025. While low mileage typically correlates with reduced wear on suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers, it also raises questions about fluid changes (brakes, steering, transmission) and potential corrosion from moisture exposure if the car was left stationary for extended periods. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of suspension components—particularly rear bushes and coil springs—for dry rot or excessive play, as these are common failure points in low-mileage but aged vehicles. The brakes, though never failed in MOT tests, warrant close examination for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the retests in 2023 and 2024 involved brake-related advisories not logged in the public record. Structural integrity should also be assessed, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, for signs of corrosion that could compromise safety. Tyre condition, despite passing MOTs, should be verified, as failing twice on tread depth suggests either basic upkeep was neglected or the vehicle was driven on worn tyres between tests.