2018 Nissan Juke 1.6L Petrol · DP67 GHG

The 2018 Nissan Juke’s most recent MOT, conducted just five months ago on 12 February 2026 at 115,532 miles, passed without any recorded defects, indicating the vehicle currently meets all DVSA roadworthiness criteria. However, the preceding test history reveals a pattern of recurring minor issues rather than a consistent improvement or deterioration. Front lower oil leaks were noted in both the February 2023 and February 2025 tests, suggesting either a persistent gasket failure or inadequate attention to fluid maintenance. Tyre conditions also demonstrate neglect—front tyres were repeatedly flagged for tread wear or damage (2022 cut, 2025 edge wear), while the nail in the offside rear tyre in 2025 implies delayed repairs. The parking brake lever’s wear in 2023 further hints at inconsistent upkeep. While no major structural or safety-critical failures have been recorded, the cumulative trend suggests the vehicle has not undergone systematic maintenance, particularly in fluid systems and tyres. The recorded mileage of 115,532 miles over eight years—approximately 14,442 miles annually—is unusually high for a vehicle of this age, exceeding typical UK usage patterns. The most significant mileage jump occurred between the February 2022 (60,497 miles) and February 2023 (80,809 miles) tests, a 20,312-mile increase in just over a year, which may correlate with the first appearance of suspension bush wear and tyre damage. Subsequent mileage increments, while still elevated, show a more stable but still aggressive rate: 17,000 miles between 2023 and 2024, and another 10,373 miles by 2025. This consistent high usage raises concerns about accelerated wear on suspension components, brakes, and drivetrain elements, even if no major failures have been formally recorded. A prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the front suspension, particularly the lower arm bushes and associated oil leaks, as these were flagged twice and may indicate underlying corrosion or improper fitting. The brakes, while not explicitly failing, warrant scrutiny for uneven wear or binding—tyre conditions in past tests suggest potential alignment or caliper issues. Structural integrity checks are advisable, focusing on wheel arches, subframe mounts, and sills for signs of corrosion, given the vehicle’s age and mileage. Additionally, the history of tyre damage and wear implies the current tyres may be beyond their optimal lifespan; verifying their age (via DOT codes) and condition is essential. Finally, the absence of advisories in recent tests does not guarantee current compliance—an independent brake and suspension assessment is strongly recommended to confirm there are no hidden failures.